Calidad de vida en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica en confinamiento por pandemia de COVID-19 en Argentina / Quality of life in patients with systemic sclerosis in confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina

Introducción: los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas tienen una calidad de vida significativamente deteriorada. La pandemia por COVID-19 tuvo un notable impacto sobre la población y los sistemas de salud de todo el mundo. Objetivos: en este trabajo nos proponemos conocer el impacto de la pandemia en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) y cómo fue el acceso a la atención médica. Materiales y métodos: mediante encuestas anónimas y digitales a pacientes durante julio y agosto de 2020 se evaluó la calidad de vida utilizando el cuestionario de calidad de vida de la esclerosis sistémica (SScQoL). Además, se realizaron preguntas para evaluar el acceso al sistema de salud durante ese período. Resultados: se encuestaron 300 pacientes con ES. La mediana de afectación de la calidad de vida según el cuestionario utilizado fue de 17 (9,25-22) y el dolor fue el dominio más afectado. El 29,33% no hizo los controles médicos. El 74,33% refirió haber tenido estudios médicos pendientes al inicio de la cuarentena y solo el 25% pudo realizarlos. Conclusiones: los pacientes con ES presentaron compromiso de la calidad de vida durante la pandemia y mostraron dificultades en el acceso al sistema de salud.

Introduction: patients with rheumatic diseases have a significantly impaired quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the population and health systems around the world. Objectives: to analyze the impact of the pandemic on the quality of life and access to medical care of patients with systemic sclerosis (SS). Materials and methods: through anonymous and digital surveys of patients during July and August 2020, quality of life was assessed using the Systemic Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (SScQoL). In addition, questions were asked to assess access to the health system during that period. Results: 300 patients with SS were surveyed. The median quality of life affectation according to the questionnaire used was 17 (9.25-22), with pain being the most affected domain. Twenty-nine percent did not attend their medical appointments, 74.33% reported having pending medical studies at the beginning of the quarantine, and only 25% could carry them out. Conclusions: patients with SS presented compromised quality of life during the pandemic and showed difficulties in accessing the health system.

Vacunación contra SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica en Argentina: preferencias, acceso y adherencia al plan de vacunación / Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with systemic sclerosis in Argentina: preferences, access and adherence to the vaccination plan

Introducción: en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas autoinmunes se recomienda la aplicación sistemática y secuencial de una serie de vacunas para la prevención de enfermedades transmisibles. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la proporción de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) que recibieron vacunación contra el coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materiales y métodos: se envió una encuesta anónima por correo electrónico o contacto por WhatsApp desde mayo a septiembre de 2021, con preguntas para evaluar la adherencia al esquema de vacunación recomendado en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas, así como temores, preferencias y adherencia al esquema de vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: se incluyeron 295 pacientes con ES. El 68,81% estaba vacunado contra el SARS-CoV-2 con al menos una dosis, de los cuales el 48,7% tenía dos dosis. El 84,75% refirió conversar con su médico sobre su esquema de vacunación general. Solo el 5,4% tenía las cuatro vacunas. El 93,56% manifestó voluntad de vacunarse contra el SARS-CoV-2; el 56,27% prefirió la vacuna Sputnik V. El 7,46% manifestó su voluntad de no vacunarse. Los factores que influyeron en la adherencia a la vacunación, con mayor frecuencia, fueron el miedo a contraer la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (86,1%) y las reacciones adversas (23,05%). Conclusiones: destacamos el hecho de que solo 6 meses después de que se dispusiera la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2, la mitad de los pacientes con ES tenía el esquema recomendado completo.

Introduction: in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, the systematic and sequential application of a series of vaccines is recommended for the prevention of communicable diseases. The objective was to estimate the proportion of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who received vaccination against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materials and methods: since may to september 2021, an anonymous survey was sent by email or messaging app, containing questions to assess adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as fears, preferences and adherence to vaccination schedule against SARS-CoV-2. Results: 295 patients with SSc were included. 68.81% were vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 with at least one dose, 48.7% of this group had two doses. 84.75% reported talking to their doctor about their general vaccination schedule. Only 5.4% had all four vaccines. 93.56% expressed willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, 56.27% preferred the Sputnik V vaccine. 7.46% expressed their willingness to not be vaccinated. The factors that most frequently influenced adherence to vaccination were fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (86.1%) and adverse reactions (23.05%). Conclusions: we highlight the fact that only 6 months after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became available, half of the patients with SSc had the full recommended schedule.

Anticuerpos anti-RNA polimerasa III en esclerosis sistémica: estudio multicéntrico de Argentina / Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Multicentric Study from Argentina

Objetivo: Describir la frecuencia del anticuerpo anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) de un grupo de centros asistenciales de Argentina, y explorar las diferencias entre pacientes con anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo y negativo. Pacientes y métodos: Se recopilaron datos de las historias clínicas, anamnesis y exámenes físicos de 135 pacientes con ES (ACR/EULAR 2013), de los cuales se obtuvo una muestra de suero para la detección de anti-RNA polimerasa III IgG por ELISA. Resultados: El 92,6% fueron mujeres, la mediana de edad al diagnóstico fue de 53 años (rango: 12-87), el 77,7% tenía ES limitada, el 19,3% tenía ES difusa y el 2,9% con ES sine esclerodermia. El 67,5% de los pacientes pertenecían a la etnia mestiza o amerindia. La frecuencia de anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo fue del 5,9%. En 36 pacientes los anticuerpos anticentrómero (ACA) y anti-Scl70 fueron negativos; el anti-RNA polimerasa III fue positivo en el 16,7% de estos 36 pacientes. El grupo de pacientes con anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo tuvo una mayor frecuencia de cicatrices puntiformes e hipertensión arterial pulmonar, y una mayor edad al diagnóstico. No se encontró asociación con ectasia vascular gástrica antral. La única paciente con crisis renal esclerodérmica, fue anti-RNA polimerasa III positiva. Conclusiones: La frecuencia de anti-RNA polimerasa III encontrada en este estudio fue una de las más bajas reportadas, lo cual podría estar relacionado con el predominio de la etnia mestiza y amerindia. Si bien se necesitan más estudios, es posible que la detección del anti-RNA polimerasa III permita clasificar mejor a los pacientes con ES, conocer su pronóstico y mejorar el seguimiento.(AU)

Objective: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. Patients and Methods: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. Results: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range: 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. Conclusions: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.(AU)

Anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies in systemic sclerosis: Multicentric study from Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.

Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Multicentric Study from Argentina. / Anticuerpos anti-RNA polimerasa III en esclerosis sistémica: estudio multicéntrico de Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range: 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.

Evaluación de las necesidades educacionales de los pacientes con artritis reumatoide mediante el cuestionario SpENAT / Evaluation of the educational needs in Argentine patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the SpENAT questionnaire

INTRODUCCIÓN: El Educational Needs Assessment Tool-versión española (SpENAT) es un cuestionario autorreportado que evalúa las necesidades educacionales (NEd) con el fin de dar información adaptada y centrada en el paciente con artritis reumatoide (AR). Comprende 39 preguntas agrupadas en 7 dominios: Manejo del dolor, Movimiento, Sentimientos, Proceso de artritis, Tratamientos, Medidas de autoayuda y Sistemas de apoyo. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar las NEd en pacientes con AR mediante el SpENAT y determinar cuáles son las principales fuentes de información a las que consultan. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, analítico, de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos≥18 años con diagnóstico de AR (ACR 87 y/o ACR-EULAR 2010). Se consignaron datos demográficos, nivel educativo, características de la enfermedad y medidas clinimétricas. Todos los pacientes completaron el SpENAT y fueron interrogados acerca de las fuentes a las que acuden para obtener información de su enfermedad. ANÁLISIS ESTADÍSTICO: Se describieron las características poblacionales. Se determinaron las NEd como porcentajes del puntaje máximo posible de cada dominio. Se compararon las necesidades por dominio según sexo, años de educación, tiempo de evolución, uso de biológico y capacidad funcional mediante test de Anova y las comparaciones de a pares con prueba t de Student y corrección de Bonferroni. Se determinó correlación entre los dominios con test de Spearman. Se comparó la edad según la fuente de información con la prueba t de Student. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 496 pacientes de 20 centros de todo el país. Se observaron mayores NEd en los dominios Movimiento, Sentimientos y Proceso de artritis. Los pacientes de mayor nivel educacional (>7 años) refirieron mayores NEd en los dominios Proceso de artritis y Medidas de autoayuda. Un mayor deterioro funcional (HAQ≥0,87) se asoció con unas mayores NEd en todos los dominios. Los pacientes con alta actividad mostraron mayores NEd que los pacientes en remisión en los dominios Manejo del dolor, Movimiento, Sentimientos, Tratamientos y Sistemas de apoyo, y que los pacientes con baja actividad en los dominios Medidas de autoayuda y Sistemas de apoyo. Todos los dominios del SpENAT mostraron correlaciones positivas entre sí (p < 0,0001), siendo las más importantes Manejo del dolor/Movimiento y Tratamientos/Proceso de artritis (r≥0,7). La fuente de información más consultada fue el reumatólogo (93,95%); quienes recurrían a Internet tenían una menor edad en promedio (p = 0,0004). CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con AR manifestaron un gran interés por conocer más sobre su enfermedad. Un elevado deterioro funcional se asocia con mayores NEd. Los pacientes con alta actividad de la enfermedad presentan mayores NEd en casi todos los dominios. El médico reumatólogo es la principal fuente de información del paciente con AR

BACKGROUND: The SpENAT, a Spanish version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool, is a self-completed questionnaire that assesses educational needs (ENs) with the purpose of providing tailored and patient-centered information. It consists of 39 questions grouped into the 7 following domains: Pain management, Movement, Feelings, Arthritic process, Treatments, Self-help measures and Support system. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to describe the ENs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using the SpENAT and to determine the main sources of information consulted by these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. We included consecutive patients≥18 years with diagnosis of RA (ACR 87/ACR-EULAR 2010). Sociodemographic data, disease characteristics and clinimetric properties were recorded. All patients completed the SpENAT and were asked about the sources employed to obtain information about their disease. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Population characteristics were described. ENs were determined as percentages of the highest possible score for each domain. Needs for each domain according to sex, years of education, disease duration, use of biologicals and functional capacity were analyzed by means of ANOVA, and bivariate comparisons were made with Student's t-test and the Bonferroni correction. Correlation between domains was determined with the Spearman correlation coefficient. We compared patients' age by source of information with Student's t-test. RESULTS: We included 496 patients from 20 centers across the country. More ENs were observed in the domains of Movement, Feelings and the Arthritic process. Patients with higher educational level (>7 years) reported more ENs in the Arthritic process and Self-help measure domains. A higher functional impairment (HAQ-A≥0.87) was associated with more ENs in every domain. Patients with high activity showed more ENs than those in remission in the domains of Pain management, Movement, Feelings, Treatments and Support system, as well as those with low activity in Self-help measures and Support system domains. All SpENAT domains showed positive correlations among each other (P<.0001), the most important being Pain management/Movement and Treatments/Arthritic process (r≥0.7). The source of information most frequently consulted was the rheumatologist (93.95%); those who made use of Internet were on average younger (P=.0004). CONCLUSION: RA patients were very interested about knowing more about their disease. High functional impairment was associated with more ENs. Patients with high disease activity had higher EN levels in almost every domain. The rheumatologist was the main source of information for the patient with RA

Evaluation of the Educational Needs in Argentine Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the SpENAT Questionnaire. / Evaluación de las necesidades educacionales de los pacientes con artritis reumatoide mediante el cuestionario SpENAT.

BACKGROUND: The SpENAT, a Spanish version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool, is a self-completed questionnaire that assesses educational needs (ENs) with the purpose of providing tailored and patient-centered information. It consists of 39 questions grouped into the 7 following domains: Pain management, Movement, Feelings, Arthritic process, Treatments, Self-help measures and Support system. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to describe the ENs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using the SpENAT and to determine the main sources of information consulted by these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. We included consecutive patients≥18 years with diagnosis of RA (ACR 87/ACR-EULAR 2010). Sociodemographic data, disease characteristics and clinimetric properties were recorded. All patients completed the SpENAT and were asked about the sources employed to obtain information about their disease. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Population characteristics were described. ENs were determined as percentages of the highest possible score for each domain. Needs for each domain according to sex, years of education, disease duration, use of biologicals and functional capacity were analyzed by means of ANOVA, and bivariate comparisons were made with Student's t-test and the Bonferroni correction. Correlation between domains was determined with the Spearman correlation coefficient. We compared patients' age by source of information with Student's t-test. RESULTS: We included 496 patients from 20 centers across the country. More ENs were observed in the domains of Movement, Feelings and the Arthritic process. Patients with higher educational level (>7 years) reported more ENs in the Arthritic process and Self-help measure domains. A higher functional impairment (HAQ-A≥0.87) was associated with more ENs in every domain. Patients with high activity showed more ENs than those in remission in the domains of Pain management, Movement, Feelings, Treatments and Support system, as well as those with low activity in Self-help measures and Support system domains. All SpENAT domains showed positive correlations among each other (P<.0001), the most important being Pain management/Movement and Treatments/Arthritic process (r≥0.7). The source of information most frequently consulted was the rheumatologist (93.95%); those who made use of Internet were on average younger (P=.0004). CONCLUSION: RA patients were very interested about knowing more about their disease. High functional impairment was associated with more ENs. Patients with high disease activity had higher EN levels in almost every domain. The rheumatologist was the main source of information for the patient with RA.

Síndrome doloroso regional complejo tipo 1. Análisis de 108 pacientes / Complex regional pain syndrome type 1: analysis of 108 patients

Introducción. El síndrome doloroso regional complejo (SDRC) tipo 1 se caracteriza por la presencia de dolor, edema, impotencia funcional, limitación de la movilidad, cambios tróficos, inestabilidad vasomotora y desmineralización ósea. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo y prospectivo de 108 pacientes de más de 18 años de edad, con sospecha clínica de SDRC, que cumplieran criterios de Doury. Se registraron datos demográficos, características clínicas, comorbilidades, antecedentes predisponentes y factores desencadenantes como traumatismo o fractura. Se evaluaron datos de laboratorio, radiografía simple comparativa, gammagrafía ósea en 3 fases con tecnecio 99 y densitometría ósea, al igual que tratamiento farmacológico, rehabilitación y evolución. Resultados. Se incluyó a 108 pacientes, el 89% de sexo femenino, con una edad promedio de 54,8±12,4 años. El tiempo de evolución desde el comienzo de los síntomas en el momento de la consulta fue de 3,1 meses. Dentro de los factores desencadenantes, prevaleció el traumatismo con el 91,7%. La ansiedad se asoció como el factor psicológico más frecuente (42,6%). El dolor estuvo presente en el 100% de los pacientes y la limitación de la movilidad en 99,07% de los mismos. La localización más frecuente fue mano en el 75% (81/108 pacientes), seguido de síndrome hombro mano (10,9%). Se realizó radiografía comparativa en todos los casos, observando alteraciones en el 93,5%. A 32 pacientes se les realizó gammagrafía ósea en 3 fases que fueron patológicos en el 100% de los casos. Se solicitó densitometría ósea en 54 pacientes (50%). De los tratamientos indicados, todos los pacientes recibieron antiinflamatorios no esteroideos y el más frecuente fue el diclofenaco (60%). Ciento seis pacientes (98,2%) utilizaron terapia con calcio, el 97,2% vitamina D3. El 100% recibió bifosfonatos y los más utilizados fueron el alendronato y el ibandronato (el 67,6 y el 27,8%, respectivamente). Treinta y seis pacientes (33,3%) utilizaron glucocorticoides. Todos los pacientes evaluados recibieron terapia ocupacional como tratamiento rehabilitador. El tiempo de curación presentó una media de 6,31 meses (4-24). La evolución fue favorable en el 88,9% de la presente serie. Conclusión. El trabajo muestra las características clínicas, terapéuticas y evolutivas de SDRC tipo 1 observadas en 108 pacientes. Se reconoce como un síndrome heterogéneo, que no siempre presenta la sintomatología conocida y se recomienda plantear diagnóstico diferencial con otras patologías infecciosas e inflamatorias. Es importante destacar que la derivación precoz, permite un tratamiento oportuno (AU)

Introduction. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 is characterized by the presence of pain, edema, functional impotence, impaired mobility, trophic changes, vasomotor instability and bone demineralization. Material and methods. We carried out a retrospective and prospective, descriptive, observational study of 108 patients over 18 years of age with suspected CRPS who met Doury's criteria. We recorded demographic data, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, previous predisposing conditions and triggering factors, such as injury or fracture. We evaluated laboratory data, serial plain X-rays, 3-phase bone scintigraphy with technetium 99 and bone density scan, as well as drug treatment, rehabilitation and disease course. Results. In all, 89% of the 108 patients were women with an average age of 54.8±12.4 years. The time between the onset of the symptoms and the first visit to a physician was 3.1 months. The most common triggering factor was injury (91.7%). The most frequent psychological factor was anxiety (42.6%). All the patients reported pain and 99.07% had impaired mobility. The most frequently affected part of the body was the hand (75%; 81/108 patients) followed by the shoulder, in the shoulder-hand syndrome. All the patients had serial X-rays and changes were observed in 93.5%. Three-phase bone scintigraphy revealed evidence of disease in all 32 of the patients who underwent this study. Bone density scanning was performed in 54 patients (50%). All the patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mainly diclofenac (60%). Calcium therapy was initiated in 106 patients (98.2%) and vitamin D3 therapy in 97.2%. All the patients received bisphosphonates, primarily alendronate and ibandronate (67.6% and 27.8%, respectively). Thirty-six patients (33.3%) received corticosteroids. All of the evaluated patients underwent rehabilitation involving occupational therapy. The average time to recovery was 6.31 months (range, 4-24). The outcome was favorable in 88.9% of the patients. Conclusion. This paper describes the clinical characteristics, therapeutic features and outcome of CRPS type 1 in 108 patients. This syndrome is known to be heterogeneous, and does not always present with the well-known symptoms. We recommend establishing a differential diagnosis including other infectious and inflammatory conditions, and point out the importance of early referral, which enables early treatment (AU)

Complex regional pain syndrome type 1: Analysis of 108 patients. / Síndrome doloroso regional complejo tipo 1. Análisis de 108 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 is characterized by the presence of pain, edema, functional impotence, impaired mobility, trophic changes, vasomotor instability and bone demineralization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective and prospective, descriptive, observational study of 108 patients over 18 years of age with suspected CRPS who met Doury's criteria. We recorded demographic data, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, previous predisposing conditions and triggering factors, such as injury or fracture. We evaluated laboratory data, serial plain X-rays, 3-phase bone scintigraphy with technetium 99 and bone density scan, as well as drug treatment, rehabilitation and disease course. RESULTS: In all, 89% of the 108 patients were women with an average age of 54.8±12.4 years. The time between the onset of the symptoms and the first visit to a physician was 3.1 months. The most common triggering factor was injury (91.7%). The most frequent psychological factor was anxiety (42.6%). All the patients reported pain and 99.07% had impaired mobility. The most frequently affected part of the body was the hand (75%; 81/108 patients) followed by the shoulder, in the shoulder-hand syndrome. All the patients had serial X-rays and changes were observed in 93.5%. Three-phase bone scintigraphy revealed evidence of disease in all 32 of the patients who underwent this study. Bone density scanning was performed in 54 patients (50%). All the patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mainly diclofenac (60%). Calcium therapy was initiated in 106 patients (98.2%) and vitamin D3 therapy in 97.2%. All the patients received bisphosphonates, primarily alendronate and ibandronate (67.6% and 27.8%, respectively). Thirty-six patients (33.3%) received corticosteroids. All of the evaluated patients underwent rehabilitation involving occupational therapy. The average time to recovery was 6.31 months (range, 4-24). The outcome was favorable in 88.9% of the patients. CONCLUSION: This paper describes the clinical characteristics, therapeutic features and outcome of CRPS type 1 in 108 patients. This syndrome is known to be heterogeneous, and does not always present with the well-known symptoms. We recommend establishing a differential diagnosis including other infectious and inflammatory conditions, and point out the importance of early referral, which enables early treatment.